Why Banning Gays and Transgenders from the Military is Bad for Your Wallet

Subscribers get two chances to win a free audio copy of Jim Collins's The Simple Path to Wealth in December. Mr. Money Mustache reads the Forward. Don't miss out. Subscribe today!

Hatred is in the air and it’s costing the nation plenty and a whole lot more to those who harbor the hate. The President has now banned transgender people from the military and the alt-right is cheering. And it’s a stupid idea.

It is easy to see how dumb this policy is if you think about it for even a moment. If we exclude gays and transgender people from the military because it might hurt morale, why not exclude these people from all areas of society. Think about it. We can complain when they work and complain when they don’t. We can really mess with these people.

But let’s not stop there, my Aryan Judeo-Christian friends. As long as we are excluding those we consider undesirable we need to name the groups we want out. The gays and transgender people are only the beginning. We had a little thing called the Civil War that started 156 years ago. The discussion was slavery if memory serves me right, but it might be fake news. Women gained suffrage in 1920 in the U.S. with ratification of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution. White men haven’t heard the end of it ever since.

Let’s take a tally. We want gays, queers, transgenders, blacks, Mexicans, women, and let’s not forget the Jews (of which a tincture probably runs through the author’s veins) from serving in the military. Basically, we only want white men in the military.

Here is why this is soooooo stupid. When the military is called to duty only white men will be on the line fighting for the nation. Inevitably some of these fine young “white” men will die. That will leave a disproportionate number of gays, transgender, black, Hispanic and other undesirables to spend time with, shall we say, white women.

It’s hard being a racist when you really start to think about it. Now we get to think about how it is killing your pocketbook.




Into the Foxhole

The argument for keeping gay and transgender people out of the military is still a powerful debate. Nothing drives more fear in a white man’s heart than being hunkered down in a foxhole with bullets whizzing overhead only to be interrupted by the sound of his buddy unzipping his fly. I get it. (Bad choice of words.)

You see, gay guys have to have sex with every guy they get within 10 feet of. Guys understand this. “Normal” guys have sex with any woman within arm’s reach. Right? No! Let me get this straight (another interesting word considering the conversation). A guy can be around a female and act like an adult, having an intelligent conversation with said woman without any possibility of coitus? Really? If this is true then it might be possible for a gay guy to not be in the mood while in the foxhole. And guys, you are not required to date the guy in the skirt. It’s optional!

To recap: Gay people don’t jump every human of the same gender!

Now listen close my tiki torch carrying friends. The problem isn’t with them; it’s with you! This is a personal finance blog and the United States prides itself as an economic leader. Therefore, we can state the facts and then correlate how it affects your wealth.

Some costs to your income and net worth are obvious. Getting your mug on the front page news spewing hate and engaging in violence can cost plenty in legal fees and losing your job doesn’t necessarily help the family budget. At least your hate for social programs like food stamps and welfare reduced to painfully low levels will be no safety net for you either. More important to keep taxes low. AND GET A JOB!

When did it become a battle cry to complain when people don’t work and to whine like a two year old when they do? If a guy wants to wear a mini skirt and high heels, who am I to argue. Klinger was in the military and things turned out okay. Of course with a doctor named BJ. . .  (What? M.A.S.H was a television show. Really? It’s wasn’t real? Get outta here!) It has come to my attention you should disregard this paragraph. —The Editor

My Favorite Color

The logic surrounding the recent increased violence in the United States is lost on this backwoods accountant. Business owners actually deny service to clients based on religious beliefs, the color of their skin or who they boink when the lights go out.

What really blows my mind is we want to keep certain groups out of the military while we need more hard working (I said hard working!) people to serve the nation in the military. Does this mean the tiki torch carrying crowd is marching to the recruiter’s office to sign up? Are they indicating their support for the draft? I’m confused.

Several years ago I had Lasik surgery on both my eyes. In my community there are several choices for this surgery. After careful research I concluded Dr. Alexander was the best doctor in the field locally. Eyes are important so I wanted the best. I paid above average to have my precious eyes see 20/20.




Dr. Alexander did an awesome job on my eyes. And he is black. I didn’t care; it didn’t bother me. And isn’t it like a white guy. As soon as the chips are down the black guy is good enough to bail my tail out. And if the good doctor happened to be transgender it would not have bothered me either. I wasn’t looking for a date; I wanted my eyes fixed!

I have gay clients, transgender clients, black clients, female clients, Hispanic clients and even Jewish clients. The one thing I can tell you about every one of them is this: They came to me for help and they showed me something green. Money green always grabs my attention.

In all my years of practice I never once asked a client (or employee) about their sexual orientation. They need tax work or business planning done and I’m the guy to do it. I don’t offer sexual services in my office.

My office manager is Puerto Rican. You should be glad she works for me! She keeps my tail moving in the right direction. My business would be less profitable if Karen were not there. Skin color never once entered the equation. It’s like my eyes; I hired the best and the best just happened to not be white. Who cares? I wasn’t there for a skin graft! I wanted my eyes fixed without incident. Dr. Alexander delivered.

When I see the rallies and violence over immigration I am appalled. We need immigration reform in the U.S. I agree with that. But the concept of ‘kick’em all out’ is butt stupid. They want to work! When has that become a problem?

We have real issues in our modern world. Income and wealth inequality are caustic problems begging for solutions. Nuclear weapons are aimed at our cities and territories and the best we can come up with is a wall? Our infrastructure is crumbling and the best our supreme leader can come up with is “ban transgender people from the military”. Our tax code is in desperate need of revision and instead of working on the problem we waste time pardoning an ex-sheriff who treated Hispanics reprehensibly.

Perhaps the reason we have anemic economic growth and a declining labor participation rate isn’t about some minority group we want to beat up on this week. Maybe the problem is white men. If white men have so much time on their hands maybe they should get a job or two so there are none left for the Mexicans. All I hear is “Kick them out”, but I see no white protestors lining up to fill the vacancies.

I am a white male and feel disgusted at the legacy my race is leaving. We seem to hate all who are not white and even hate anyone white who dares show kindness to anyone not white and male.

History is clear on this. It never ends well for the racists. It isn’t all that good for the rest of the crowd either. If you don’t believe me, research the late 1930’s to 1945. Hate only knows how to destroy. Hate is the acid which destroys the vessel which contains it. And it’s bad for business, jobs and personal wealth.

I do not care if my eye doctor is getting rich. I actually hope he is. He provided an incredible service to me and I fully expect he will enjoy the rewards of his talents.

I cheer on my clients. Many Hispanic business owners utilize my services. The biggest issue I have is communication. Sometimes I cannot understand what they are saying as their English is still spotty. Then Karen steps in and speaks Hispanic fluently. There is great respect between my non-white business owners and me. I want them to do well; I want them to win. When they thrive, so do I!

Over the years I have had a small number of transgender clients. There were probably more than I was aware of. In the 1970s and 80s the world’s leading sex change doctor worked at a hospital less than five miles from my office. A few of his clients wandered through my doors.

The hate has to stop. Yes, it can be uncomfortable when a transgender, gay, black, Hispanic, woman, et cetera is in the room under certain circumstances. You are an adult. You can deal with it. Uncomfortable usually means unfamiliar. Get familiar and the discomfort will go away.

A Final Story

Many years ago Mrs. Accountant and I were in Dallas attending a seminar. In our free time we enjoy visiting museums. We found ourselves at a museum with an IMAX theatre near the Cotton Bowl. Time got away from us and so did our ride. We were stranded late at night as the museum was closing. We had to leave.

This had all the hallmarks of a very bad outcome. This was before the days of cell phones and Uber. There was a pay phone inside the building, but no phonebook to find the number of a taxi service. I had money for the phone if only I had the number of a cab company.

I asked every person there if they could help. Each walked past annoyed at my interrupting their life until a black woman wandered near. She was tired and cranky after a long day of work. Still, she helped Mrs. Accountant and me find a taxi phone number. At that moment she was the most awesome woman on earth.

In the end it worked out. We got our cab ride back to the hotel without incident.

That is why I will never rally against any group of people. You never know when someone from a certain group will be your only salvation. A guy in a hot pink mini skirt helping Mrs. Accountant and me out of the bad situation would have been just as welcome.

Don’t hate, kind readers. Hate always ends in pain for all parties involved. My youngest daughter was born cisgender, a genetic defect where her gender was assigned at birth because her gender wasn’t apparent at birth. I love my daughter. God created her as she is. Who am I to argue with God? No one should hate her because of a gender issue.

If our nation faces a crisis I will not spend a second thinking if the people protecting my country, me , my family, friends and clients, are gay, straight, transgender, the color of their skin, ethnicity or religious faith.

When that day comes, and it always does, they will be the most awesome people to me no matter what their personal life is.

 

Note September 20, 2017: When I wrote this post I had been introduced to a new word about my daughter’s condition: cisgender. At first I thought this was the new “politically correct” way to speak about intersex children. It isn’t. I was using the term wrong as a comment below mentions. There are so many terms bandied around today to deal with gender and sexuality it is confusing even to a dad with a daughter born intersex. So, to clarify, the article above is correct as long as you replace cisgender with intersex. No matter what name society uses to identify my daughter’s condition, I still love her to death. She is my sweetheart along with her sister and mom.

 



The Wealthy Accountant and ADP partnership gives you top notch payroll service and support and a 20% discount. Click this banner or contact ADP by phone or email. Mention The Wealthy Accountant so you get your discount.

Posted in

Keith Schroeder

19 Comments

  1. Mrs. Picky Pincher on August 28, 2017 at 8:01 am

    It warmed my heart to read this; thanks for having some decency, Mr. Accountant. 🙂 It’s never been more important to speak out against hatred. People always forget that these policies have a ripple effect.

    • Keith Schroeder on August 28, 2017 at 10:30 am

      Thanks for the kind words, Pincher. This is a heated topic and I am catching grief for it. It still needed to be said. Those who disagree should use this as a forum to spread their opinions and experiences. I’m not the final arbiter on this. I will allow more heated comments in this post because it is too important to hear all opinions. Together we create a better nation.

  2. Scott on August 28, 2017 at 8:19 am

    Your topic is, “The President has now banned transgender people from the military and the alt-right is cheering. And it’s a stupid idea.” You were arguing something totally different, “If we exclude gays and transgender people from the military because it might hurt morale, why not exclude these people from all areas of society.” No one is banning gays from the military. I fought along side homosexuals, and generally speaking, they were outstanding soldiers. This was about transgendered ‘soldiers.’

    Maybe you’re too busy trying to cram a political stance into a personal finance blog to notice? And how did you come up with the part about morale? It has nothing to do with the actual topic. Transgendered troops have a much higher rate of mental disorder, and physical therapy profile (basically the military version of a doctor’s note saying you can’t do military things like lifting, running, etc.), and are non-deployable for much of their enlistment. This was about military readiness. Transgendered troops can choose to undergo a year of hormone therapy this is expensive to the Gov’t, requires them to be on PT profile so they can’t train and they’re not deployable. Then they have surgery and are non-deployable again for at least another year while they heal and continue hormone therapy.

    Why allow someone to join the military when they will not be able to serve the military? It was a cash grab where these troops received 50k in free medical and an honorable discharge for not helping the military unit. And what about the rest of the soldiers that have to cover down for the person missing from deployment?

    This isn’t mean, this is logical. It’s stopping theft and waste by a very small section of the population. Above all, it’s a really dumb way to relate your personal political beliefs to personal finance.

    “Basically, we only want white men in the military.” -No one is saying that.

    unsubscribed.

    • Keith Schroeder on August 28, 2017 at 8:37 am

      Those were the arguments used to exclude women from the military, Scott; they have higher medical bills, pregnancy, and can’t lift and run like men. The rest you are taking out of context. Gays were once banned from the military as well as blacks and women if you look back far enough. There were reasons for the ban as there always is. The only current assessment involves the recent transgender ban.

      My political beliefs are stripped from this post (and I am a card-carrying Republican for the record); I was more critical of Obama when he was President (read the post: https://wealthyaccountant.com/2017/08/02/the-mistake-obama-and-trump-both-made/). The cost argument is hollow since sending men into a war zone means we will have serious medical issues for some of our troops. The government can choose to not cover sex change operations which would be an appropriate solution to the money issue. There are better answers than telling Americans they can no longer serve their nation.

      As for unsubscribing, I am okay with that. I never started this blog to tell you what you want to hear, but to communicate what you must hear, even if it hurts your feelings. If I don’t make you uncomfortable with my writing then I am doing it wrong. You are only hurting yourself when you limit your knowledge. (Update: A few are unsubscribing (3), but many more are adding their name to the list so it is a net gain. I encourage you to subscribe and to share on your social media. Much of what I say here is rarely found elsewhere. If I get you to think about the issue we are all better.)

      Finally, This is the perfect venue for you to share your rebuttal. I don’t know everything! Your experiences are valid and important to share even if it makes other readers uncomfortable. No more hate and threats. Time to talk like adults and solve problems while we still can. (FYI: My office manger’s husband is in the military.)

      • Hard L on August 28, 2017 at 9:17 am

        WA, Scott is accurate is his assessment and your claiming “adult” at the end indicates you aren’t in this case – an employee’s husband’s service notwithstanding. It reveals weak bon fides of your knowledge of military “readiness”.

        Now, friend, about my inversion of the FI ladder down, down into the gates of hell, what is your recommendation on switching to a Universal Amplified Variable Life Insurance opportunity?

        • Keith Schroeder on August 28, 2017 at 9:37 am

          Hard L, this is really taking a turn to the left on me. My whole goal with this post was to encourage people to focus on important issues. Example: tax reform is desperately needed and we are worried about pardons and transgenders. Transgender issues involving the military and Presidential pardons are important issues, of course. But infrastructure, health care and tax reform really need attention more. We need to stay focused! Will the nations suffer catastrophically if we delay action on transgenders in the military? Will lack of health care reform, tax reform or infrastructure investment cause even more damage if not addressed? I think it does. We, as a nation, must focus on the most pressing issues and stop worrying about walls (we are a nation founded on the principles of freedom) and sexual orientation. You make a powerful point I already alluded to, Hard L. I never served in the military and am unqualified to speak to our readiness. My gut feeling tells me our men and women in uniform are highly trained, competent and ready for anything thrown their way. I am very comfortable with our military protecting this nation.

          As to your question: I experiments with VULs many years ago to see how they performed in real life. The results were not flattering. It may have been a product specific issue,. However, deeper research showed some of the same problems with other VUL products. What attracted me originally to the VUL was the tax advantages. Unfortunately the internal costs offset the tax benefits. It looked great on paper, but performed terrible in real life. If you have a specific product and more details on your personal situation please share with me privately and I will see if I can give a more definitive answer. DO NOT share any personal information in the comments or public ally for your safety!

          Thanks for commenting on a tough issue, Hard L. You guys know I sometimes have a hard time communicating what I really want to say sometimes. I cannot abscond my responsibility due to my own shortcomings. If we have a dialog, even heated, it can lead to better things, more understanding and more economic prosperity for our nation.

          • Jose on August 28, 2017 at 10:48 am

            As an outsider (mexican, living and working in mexico, I’m doing fine) I agree with the real point here, most americans (democrats and republicans alike) seem perversely unaware of the real issues, the whinning and blaming is just out of control, feel to me like is some weird trait these people have to blame anyone but themselves. In the case of scott, he’s welcome to leave, but the truth is out there, you guys have much bigger problems than trannies or mexicans.



          • Keith Schroeder on August 28, 2017 at 10:50 am

            Thank you for commenting, Jose. I am glad you are part of the conversation. Your last sentence said it better than I did.



          • Hard L on August 28, 2017 at 1:22 pm

            WA, Scott is accurate is his assessment and your claiming “adult” at the end indicates you aren’t in this case – an employee’s husband’s service notwithstanding. It reveals weak bon fides of your knowledge of military “readiness”.

            Now, friend, about my inversion of the FI ladder down, down into the gates of hell, what is your recommendation on switching to a Universal Amplified Variable Life Insurance opportunity?

            WA, Your premise is absurd. It was the last administration that upended national security to use the military for social engineering. Still, transgenders go well beyond “social”. While repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” was successful, it did not require long-term, ongoing medical treatments that remove the individual from deployability. Moreover, the access to free medical care during military service to achieve the individual’s personal goal undermines reasons for enlistment – service to nation, training, education, adventure, money. These individuals look to enlist for access to the public trough for a “benefit” that no other group receives. In contrast, while the military allows many service personnel injured in war to return to duty as amputees, those personnel earned and understand the privilege being afforded them. Any of us would welcome those men and women “home” in the unit.

            To claim that the current administration’s return to “readiness” is somehow in contravention with the national interest exposes the political nature of the post. Frankly, friend, it also reveals how deep the Leftist movement has infiltrated the federal government and, in your case, thinking.

            But, I’ll keep my subscription and apologize to you. My reference to the, what I thought over-the-top, convoluted insurance product, was an unsuccessful attempt at levity. I missed the mark and will go more extremely over-the-top from now on.

            Hard L



          • Keith Schroeder on August 28, 2017 at 2:35 pm

            Hard L, I thought your question was over-the-top, but answered just in case. (I thought a few parts of the post were humorous, but it was lost due to the subject matter.) I know there is massive disagreement in this area. Readers should not agree with me all the time. If they did why bother showing up? Periodically I want to write on the tough topics. I was clear I am not an expert. The goal was to swing around to a personal finance angle. There is too much in the genre that is a pale repeat of what was said a thousand times before. Thanks for sticking with me, Hard L. And keep commenting. I only start the conversation. Readers bring it to life.



  3. Bernie on August 28, 2017 at 1:42 pm

    Hi Keith,
    I agree with your sentiment on this 100%
    I clicked the link towards the end of this post, to read about the health issues your daughters are living with. From having spent a weekend with your family, I know they are both beautiful people. The four of you are doing a wonderful job of setting a good example. Keep up the good work!!

    Bernie

    • Keith Schroeder on August 28, 2017 at 2:28 pm

      Thanks, Bernie. We still talk about our weekend at your home.

  4. Anne S on August 28, 2017 at 1:47 pm

    I’m a bit confused – isn’t “cisgender” generally used to mean the opposite of “transgender”? (so, someone whose birth gender (or birth-assigned gender) matches their gender identity?)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisgender

    • Keith Schroeder on August 28, 2017 at 2:27 pm

      Anne, a transgender person feels they were born the wrong gender; a cisgender, sometimes called intersex, is born with ambiguous genitalia. After genetic testing and difficult discussions with doctors we felt she was female. I would have preferred waiting, but the medical issues would have cost her life if we waited. The decision was made and seems to have worked out so far. She is 17 years old now and a very happy, well-adjusted young lady. Having a cisgender child modifies your value system radically as the lines are completely blurred. Here is the first full sentence in Wikipedia:

      Cisgender (often abbreviated to simply cis) is a term for people whose gender identity matches the sex that they were assigned at birth.

  5. JR on August 28, 2017 at 6:07 pm

    I think you have the right ideas about treating people well regardless of the differences between us. As a bible toting believer that is exactly what my bible teaches.I was however shocked by the complete bias you show through this whole post. You write ” I am a white male and feel disgusted at the legacy my race is leaving. We seem to hate all who are not white..” Later you say ” That is why I will never rally against any group of people.” Also. “Basically we want only white men in the military ” really ?? Who is saying that outside of a loud 5percent of the country? What about the rest of us? Now that you have your 1 horribly biased political take out of the way for the year could you please go back to the regular program?

    • Keith Schroeder on August 28, 2017 at 6:29 pm

      JR, regular programming is on the way. The 5% are very vocal and it fills the newsfeeds. This must have a negative effect of wealth in this nation. I was hoping for a more middle ground, but missed the mark. At least there was a dialog outside the traditional new feeds.Thank you for understanding.

      • RD on August 29, 2017 at 1:15 pm

        Keith, I refuse to believe it’s even 5% who are pushing what you’ve argued against, although they certainly are loud – more like 0.5%, if that. The interesting part to me is that they are loud – but it’s their “opponents” who give them the airtime by filling the news feeds, and by identifying them everywhere (even where they’re not). Makes one wonder, who’s really drumming up the fear and division in this great country?

        And that’s my problem with your post. You’re not going to reach those who are opposed to transgenders in the military based on their incorrect understanding of what it is to be transgendered when you lump them in with those who oppose gays in the military (right away in the headline) and then with racists and misogynists more generally (in the text). If you want to change their understanding, then address the issues, which seem to be medical costs and deployability. If you want to “other” them and get them to identify with the racist/etc 0.5% that they’re already being told they belong with, your post does a fantastic job of that – unfortunately that kind of rhetoric just keeps dividing people though, it will never bring them closer together.

  6. Michelle Kry on August 29, 2017 at 10:18 am

    Thank you for this post. As I was reading and seeing that you are a rural, Republican, white male, and I was amazed that we share the same views (I, a screaming liberal). Then when I got to the end and saw that your daughter was born cisgender, it occurred to me that your first hand experience with sex not being a Boolean has contributed to your liberal point of view. What do you think? I see in my own family, that once my brother started a family with a black woman, that blacks are now OK. When my nephew came out as gay, now gays are OK. I have two nieces. One needs to marry an immigrant, and the other needs to marry a Muslim. Then we have licked all the scapegoats. Financial and readiness arguments are excuses to avoid the uncomfortable feelings around others who are different.

    • Keith Schroeder on August 29, 2017 at 11:42 am

      I think you hit the nail square, Michelle: We fear what we don’t understand. There are some people with real fears, however. If I were assaulted I will probably harbor ill feelings for people who possess the characteristics of the person doing the assaulting. But many people are not assaulted but still harbor bad feelings. Why? I think it stems from a perceived harm concept or limited resources worldview. Ie., so-and-so took my job. Machines have been taking our jobs for centuries. By the mid-nineteenth century we hear the first suggestion of providing a guaranteed minimum income. And unemployment is still under 5% with machines taking more jobs. Immigrants are not the problem. They just want to provide a better life for themselves and their family. That said, immigration reform is needed. The all or none attitude is rarely helpful.

      I try to hide my political views as much as possible on this blog. However, when writing about taxes and wealth it is impossible to avoid the subject completely. Scott’s comment shows some readers are eager to misread what I am really saying. To clarify, I lean slightly right while holding many left ideas as well. No one party has carte blanche on good ideas. My personal experience with my youngest daughter HAS reshaped my viewpoint on sexuality. What seemed so clear before was blurred beyond recognition. Transgender is not a political issue; it’s personal. My baby, my child, will suffer hatred because so many don’t understand and are therefore angry against what they don’t understand. Deep down they might be suggesting I hate my own child. Insane! (I said might. I don’t think anyone is suggesting I hate my child.)

      After the few negative responses (including emails) it really has turned up. Comments and emails have been tremendously supportive. (Only 4 have unsubscribed and many more new subscribers replaced them.) I think once people had time to think about what I wrote and digested it, they realized I wasn’t pushing my politic or agenda down their throat. (I interjected enough humor to indicate that.) All I wanted was to share a worldview so they could understand a bit better things they didn’t before. Then we, as a nation, can stop hating my daughter for being born as she was, no fault or choice of her own.

      Thank you for sharing your thoughts, Michelle. Everyone not only has a voice, they should use it and be heard. We also need to listen. We will not always agree or agree on everything. That’s not the point. The point is to understand. We are all better when we do.

Leave a Comment





%d bloggers like this: